Liberal Democrat

Liberal Democrat
Liberal Democracy

Thursday, November 1, 2012

The Economist: The American Presidential Election: The Economist Endorses President Obama



What I get from The Economist endorsement of President Obama is that they are endorsing him because. Of the situation that he inherited when he became President and how he handled it, not that they believe he's a great President or he's done a great job. But because the country has come out of the "Great Recession" okay and that it could've been a lot worse and that Mitt Romney. Hasn't shown then why his Presidency would've been better and how he would be a better President. The other reason that The Economist has endorsed President Obama, is because they believe they know. What they are getting with President Obama, what type of President he is and where he's is politically. Unlike with Mitt Romney's number one weakness being, that people simply don't know what they are getting with Mitt Romney, because he's had so many different positions on so many. Issues, would a President Romney be the Governor Romney from Massachusetts, Moderate Mitt that we are. Seeing since the Presidential Debates or Neoconservative Mitt that we saw in the Republican Primaries, attempting to appeal to the Religious Right.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All relevant comments that are about the post thats being commented on, will be accepted at FRSFreeState. Links and spam aren't and won't make it on the post and will be marked as spam. FRSFreeState does not give out free advertising but if you have to say something about the post and it's relevant, those comments will be published at FRSFreeState.